Table of Contents
I 'd add Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is someplace in the top 3 however with those domestics you absolutely have my top 4 of perpetuity for reliability. Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never ever had an engine problem. Rust is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply sounded like a diesel.
I wonder just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time obtaining out of it's own means ... the 300i6 would do whatever I require this truck to do patgizz wrote: 3 points in the automobile world refuse to break.
those ought to be held as the benchmark to which everything else is determined. regrettably, almost everything else fades in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 certainly) Wow, as a result of the outpour of praise, it looked good so I bought it, below's the ad lmk what you men think Oops, really did not mean to be cryptic, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz though, I'm rather big, and the steering wheel to seat is rather slim ... male that wheel cover was not ribbed for my enjoyment:-LRB- The only problem I have actually ever seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little too difficult and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.
Keep in mind the gas mileage will not be the ideal in the world, yet it will damn sure run forever. Never ever had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just appeared like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 highway with the OD5. I ask yourself exactly how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's very own method ... The engine bay had not been created for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One canister eliminate an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, yet it draws. Mod motors require to come out laterally and you have to pull the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unlock like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane created: spitfirebill wrote: In respond to HappyAndy: Thank you Captain Obvious What did he say to require this? I'm really interested. I really did not see anything in his reply that would need this reaction. "They are generally reliable as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones wrote: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply sounded like a diesel. I question just how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Really really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I didn't explain ... my bad In reply to spitfirebill: I included that point because when I had to find a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that wasn't sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to speak regarding a couple of concerns of these vans, however I I'm clearly not going to come out and say one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same lorry.
Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines then. Let's speak regarding engine and really simply to specify that the design years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you know, I indicate, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around given that, you recognize, around that time also. We're not going to get back into, into the earlier things. Because 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are much extra preferred and I wouldn't really suggest a V6 engine.
There's a lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with blow to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have enough threading in the trigger plug, which caused issues.
Really really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't make clear ... my poor In reply to spitfirebill: I included that factor since when I had to locate a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that had not been sludged up really severely.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to chat regarding a few problems of these vans, however I I'm plainly not going to come out and claim one is better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same car.
They seem to be a bit more utilized in that location, however, you understand, those are several of the uses, however they're essentially the very same classification of vehicle. Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines after that. What problems do you see in between these two cars? Bernie: Yeah. Allow's talk concerning engine and in fact simply to define that the version years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you recognize, I suggest, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you recognize, around that time also. Since 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with strike to these engines, because they really did not have enough threading in the stimulate plug, which caused issues.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Is the Ford e150 the best car?
Is the Ford e150 the top car?
Is the Ford e150 the top truck?